Processing...
Δ
If you are considering implementing multi-cloud architecture as a part of your regular IT system integration services, now is probably the best time to do it. According to Exploding Topics research, 89% of companies around the world have already done this. Indeed, along with main benefits of migrating to cloud, such as almost unlimited scalability, access to innovative technology stacks, and introduction of cutting-edge security and fault tolerance measures, this type of architecture may open up additional opportunities for cost reduction and process optimization. Let’s discuss below what a multi-cloud strategy is, what are its benefits and drawbacks, as well as how to implement it in general.
Multi-cloud is a combination of public and, optionally, private clouds from different (two or more) platforms within one company. In this way, companies can run their services and apps in the cloud, choosing the capabilities they need without vendor lock-in. The best-known examples of platforms that offer public cloud services include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Microsoft (Azure), and IBM.
This structure significantly reduces technical risks and increases the flexibility of the company operations. In particular, multi-cloud architecture can be used both for infrastructure backup, CDN, data storing, and computing.
Let’s just take a look at last year’s statistics:
But can we only consider multi-cloud as a life changer for growing companies? In fact, there’s another fairly popular cloud architecture—hybrid. Let’s find out below what is the difference between them.
There are two related concepts: hybrid cloud and multi-cloud. But how do they differ?
Hybrid cloud architecture is a combination of two or more different clouds from one cloud provider with at least one private cloud and at least one public cloud. Typically, this deployment model is needed to host internal company resources in the private cloud and use external cloud services in the public one.
Regarding multi-cloud strategy, the presence of a private cloud is optional. However, it’s important that the public clouds that it includes refer to different cloud platforms. This deployment model provides the optimization of the price/quality ratio of cloud services available on the market, as well as extensive opportunities for implementing fault tolerance and disaster recovery scenarios.
Next, let’s find out about the benefits that businesses can gain using multi-cloud architectures.
The flexibility provided by a multi-cloud architecture greatly expands the one we’re used to in the context of the standalone models of cloud deployment. The fact is that now companies have no restrictions on access to an advanced technology stack, computing power, security, and other top services and characteristics of existing cloud platforms. They can make the best combination of what is available for the public cloud and stitch it together with unified IT infrastructure, because now they have no fixation on a specific vendor.
Why limit yourself to the capabilities of just one cloud vendor when there are many? Indeed, multi-cloud infrastructures open up vast opportunities to access best-in-class cloud services that are second to none. Examples of these services include databases, messaging systems, CDNs, and AI/ML services.
Each cloud platform has its own strengths. To expand their list of services and, in turn, attract and retain customers, these platforms regularly introduce top technologysolutions and innovations. Thus, by choosing a multi-cloud strategy, you open access to the most successful, cost-effective, and innovative solutions than would be the case with only one vendor.
By choosing a single cloud service provider for cost benefits, you can significantly lose the quality of some services that you have to use. In turn, the variability of multi-cloud solutions provides an optimal balance between quality and overhead.
And, of course, let’s remember that an equally important goal of implementing a multi-cloud strategy is to ensure increased fault tolerance of the company’s digital infrastructure. While the servers of one cloud platform may be idle for some reason, the multi-cloud will automatically transfer the workload to another cloud and thereby save your company’s infrastructure workflows from interruptions.
Even armed with the support of experienced professionals who will help you get the most out of what cloud vendors offer, you’ll also encounter the disadvantages of multi-cloud strategies. Let’s talk about them below.
Due to being tied to several cloud platforms, the company’s digital infrastructure becomes more branched and acquires more dependencies. This complicates building, scaling, and optimization.
Compared to standalone cloud deployment models, multi-cloud always has a more sophisticated architecture. Therefore, it implies more complex management procedures that would take into account the behavior of the network infrastructure when switching from one cloud platform to another.
Multi-cloud management requires deeper expertise from your personnel, so you’ll need to put in a lot of effort to train your own IT department or hire top experts and onboard them. If the time and resources required for learning aren’t in your favor, this can be a serious reason against this architecture.
The team that will migrate your IT infrastructure to the multi-cloud will need to pay special attention to the distribution of the workload of applications and services.
In particular, spreading workloads across multiple cloud platforms is difficult because you need to use platform-independent monitoring, surveillance, security, billing, and engineering tools. Therefore, you will most likely have to spend time on custom development to tie these platforms together, or purchase third-party ready-made solutions. This automatically increases the cost of building and maintaining such an infrastructure.
When the same application or service moves from one cloud to another at some stage of its operation, it can be subject to different vendor-specific security policies. Ultimately, this creates additional vulnerabilities that are sometimes impossible to prevent or eliminate completely.
Now we’ll discuss transforming the benefits of multi-cloud strategy described in the previous paragraphs into real use cases so you could decide whether you need this solution or not.
Vendor lock-in is determined by the complexity of migrating some or all of the services and/or applications within a single company’s IT infrastructure to the cloud of a new provider or to local server facilities. This happens when companies use unique high-level features in their development processes. In turn, the initial basement of your processes on the multi-cloud according to the cloud native architecture principles often implies the implementation of a native cloud architecture and, thus, excludes vendor lock-in a priori.
Data-rich systems regularly pull in more and more new data. In turn, this data is gradually beginning to require new applications and services. This phenomenon is called “data gravity,” which means reducing the barriers between data storages and the services/applications for acceptable latency and better throughput.
As data and related services and applications accumulate, companies can come to a situation in which such IT infrastructure becomes difficult (or even impossible) to transfer to new environments.
As for multi-cloud, this architecture allows companies to initially create a cloud-first infrastructure that is well adapted for such scaling. At the same time, the lack of binding to a specific cloud platform provides the desired portability.
If your applications and services are spread across multiple, widely separated regions, leveraging a single cloud model can result in performance degradation.
At the same time, the implementation of multi-cloud strategies opens up the ability to select data centers located in different geographic regions, ensuring high-speed processing of user requests around the globe.
In addition to the performance limitations of the single cloud models, you may also need to follow different regulatory requirements for user data security by region. This is easily achieved through a multi-cloud strategy and, in particular, the ability of different cloud services to comply with the standards of a specific region.
Due to the size of your company, the adoption of new technologies needed to optimize workflows may be too slow. Thus, at some point, employees in your remote offices may start using some software tools and solutions locally, which opens up new security risks that you may not even be aware of.
If you decide to implement a multi-cloud strategy, these changes can happen in sync and inextricably with all your departments. Thus, you get comprehensive control over the security of your digital infrastructure, regardless of its scale.
Despite popular cloud services guarantee 99.5% uptime for their services, companies can still face unexpected downtime, which in turn entails both additional costs and loss of reputation. Regarding multi-cloud architectures, this model implies automatic transfer of workloads to the capacities of another cloud if servers of the default one fail for some reason.
We’ve already talked about the enormous potential for cost reduction that a multi-cloud technology opens up. Indeed, with multi-cloud, the opportunity to choose the most suitable pricing model for your specific case has become wider and more flexible.
Along with all of the above benefits of multi-cloud strategy, we’d like to remind you that it isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Below we’ll consider cases in which it wouldn’t be the best solution for specific business needs.
One of the main goals of a multi-cloud strategy is to reduce the costs that can accompany you when you’re fixated on only one provider. On the other hand, if you don’t fully understand whether this goal is achievable in the case of a multi-cloud, you should think about whether you need to implement it at all. The fact is that in some cases, the savings are negligible in relation to the additional costs associated with the introduction and complication of the management processes of sophisticated infrastructure.
You should also analyze whether your current tech personnel is capable of effectively managing multi-cloud maintenance tasks. The fact is that even if your team knows how to work with certain cloud platforms, multi-cloud also assumes the presence of individual skills for the successful functioning of the entire system. Therefore, you’ll either have to hire new in-house experts, or improve the skills of existing personnel, which can be time-consuming, expensive, and not effective enough. On the other hand, you can avoid all these risks by hiring an outsourcing team like us.
At a basic level, all cloud providers have approximately the same package of services. But, when it comes to their native tools, such as AWS machine learning in the case of AWS, they are unique, and moving an application from one cloud to another (for example, for load balancing) won’t be possible. Thus, if your multi-cloud strategy cannot get around these obstacles, it’s better not to use it at all.
Finally, we propose you check seven essential steps to the successful implementation of a multi-cloud technology.
Instead of creating a unique set of policies for each cloud and thereby increasing the risk of non-compliance, you’ll need to provide a holistic approach. This can be achieved through:
To make your services and applications portable from cloud to cloud without having to change their program code, you should use containers that can make them run in any environment without impacting their performance or availability. In particular, DevOps tools such as Kubernetes and Docker Swarm may be of use to you.
You must understand that workload distribution planning is a more comprehensive process than following the rule: “If we don’t have enough cloud capacity from one vendor, we’ll transfer the workflows of the service or application to the cloud of another one”. In particular, in addition to this, you must be aware of exactly for what purposes you were originally going to use this or that cloud. This will allow you to avoid duplication of tasks assigned to different cloud providers and, thus, eliminate the need to pay for services that do the same thing.
Although almost all well-known cloud services have built-in monitoring tools, they are only able to cover a certain perimeter of the tasks within one cloud. Thus, you’ll need a platform that will be able to bring together multiple cloud providers and provide a single control panel for your multi-cloud environment. In particular, we recommend paying attention to Datadog, ScienceLogic, and Zabbix tools.
Multi-cloud environments are quite complex in terms of cost calculation and optimization. Therefore, you’ll need to implement a system that not only automatically calculates the monthly costs for the services of each of the selected cloud vendors but also monitors the volume of use of the services they provide.
As you open up access to a wide variety of security tools and practices specific to multi-cloud, you also risk exposure to new vulnerabilities not typical to underlying a standalone cloud environment. To minimize these risks, you’ll need to follow the next best practices:
And, of course, don’t forget to automate as many company processes as possible (for example, administration, application and service deployment, operations scaling, workload migration, threat and outage response, etc.). This can be achieved through the use of proper cloud APIs.
We’ve covered the basics of multi-cloud strategies, as well as multi-cloud benefits and drawbacks. Now, we hope this will help you make an informed decision about whether to choose this architecture in your particular case.
In general, this is a good idea if you don’t want to be tied to a single cloud provider and, at the same time, minimize the risks of downtime in your infrastructure. On the other hand, you must understand that it will be more difficult to manage such an infrastructure, as well as identify weak points in it that need to be optimized.
Therefore, the final decision on the implementation of the multi-cloud strategy is best made while armed with expert opinion. In particular, you can contact us, and we’ll guide you through the thorny path from the analysis of your existing infrastructure to the post-migration stages. Feel free to write or phone us right now to discuss all aspects of your cloud needs.
Be the first to get blog updates and NIX news!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
We really care about project success. At the end of the day, happy clients watching how their application is making the end user’s experience and life better are the things that matter.
Platform for Monitoring Drug Stability Budget on Excursion
Pharmaceutical
AWS-powered Development Platform for Clinical Trials Management
Healthcare
Ahoy: Flutter-based Boating Insurance App for Safer Sailing
Insurance
LibraryPass Cloud Infrastructure: Cost Optimization with AWS
Publishing
Education
Schedule Meeting